Meet Paula. The AI paralegal that moves injury cases forward.
Paula watches your firm's Outlook inbox, drives the recurring case work — records, bills, chronology, demand drafts — and routes every external send to the supervising attorney.
- records@cambridgePT.com08:14PT records — RiveraPaula reading
- Dr. Chen (Ortho)YestRe: HIPAA — Rivera
- adjuster@statefarmMonCoverage confirm
- client@rivera.dnMonQuick question
Rivera v. Boston Logistics
- 04/28ED visit · MGHEx A · p.2
- 05/03Initial PT eval · Cambridge PTEx B · p.1
- 05/10Cervical MRI · Boston ImagingEx C · p.4
- 05/226 PT visits filed · cervical + lumbar strainEx B · p.7
Follow one case from intake to released demand.
Same matter, six stages, sixty days. Scroll to watch Paula move Rivera v. Boston Logistics forward — and watch the attorney stay in the loop on everything that leaves the firm.
A new matter lands in the inbox.
An intake email from the referring clinic hits the firm Outlook. Paula recognizes it as a new matter, opens a case file, and pulls the client's name, date of loss, and reported injuries into structured fields — no paralegal touch needed.
Paula requests the records.
Paula identifies every treating provider, drafts the records and itemized-bill requests using your firm template, and queues them for attorney release. The Records Tracker now has a row for each provider with a clear status.
Records start arriving — and the missing ones get chased.
As providers respond, Paula files PDFs to the right case folder and flips status to received. When a provider goes quiet, Paula drafts a follow-up on cadence. Itemized bills that don't come back are flagged for chase.
A medical chronology, with citations.
Paula reads the received records and assembles a date-ordered treatment summary. Every entry cites the source record page, so the attorney can verify any fact in seconds instead of leafing through PDFs.
Demand v1 — drafted from real case facts.
Specials, damages, and treatment narrative roll up into a first-draft demand letter using your firm's template. Each section is source-linked. The attorney inherits a polished starting point, not a blank page.
Attorney reviews and releases.
The demand package — letter, medical chronology, exhibits index, and PDF appendices — sits in the approval inbox. The supervising attorney edits, releases, and Paula logs the send. Case moves.
New referral — Daniel Rivera (MVA, 04/28)
Mr. Rivera presented to MGH ED after a rear-end collision in Cambridge. Treating with PT and orthopedics. Please advise on next steps re: records and demand timeline.
- Client
- Daniel Rivera
- Date of loss
- 04/28
- Mechanism
- Rear-end collision
- Reported injuries
- Cervical strain · lumbar strain
- Providers
- To be confirmed
- 01SentMass General EDRecords + itemized bill request
- 02SentCambridge PTRecords + itemized bill request
- 03SentBoston ImagingRecords + itemized bill request
- 04SentDr. Chen, OrthoRecords + itemized bill request
- ReceivedMass General EDED record · 12p
- ReceivedCambridge PT6 visits · 04/29 – 05/22
- ReceivedBoston ImagingCervical MRI · 05/10
- ·ChasingDr. Chen, OrthoNo response · 18d
- 04/28ED visit · MGHCervical / lumbar strain, no fractureEx A · p.2
- 05/03Initial PT eval · Cambridge PTPain 6/10 · ROM limitedEx B · p.1
- 05/10Cervical MRI · Boston ImagingMild disc bulge C5–C6Ex C · p.4
- 05/14Ortho consult · Dr. ChenConservative tx recommendedEx D · p.3
- 05/22PT (6 visits) · Cambridge PTPain 3/10 · ROM improvingEx B · p.7
On April 28, our client Daniel Rivera was rear-ended at the intersection of Mass Ave and Vassar St while stopped at a red light. Liability is clear. [Ex E] Mr. Rivera presented to the Mass General ED that evening with cervical and lumbar strain. [Ex A]
Following ED discharge, Mr. Rivera underwent six weeks of physical therapy at Cambridge PT, a cervical MRI at Boston Imaging, and an orthopedic consult with Dr. Chen. [Ex B] [Ex C] [Ex D]
[§ Damages and prayer for relief — drafted from specials table on the right.]
- MGH ED$3,420
- Cambridge PT (6 visits)$2,180
- Boston Imaging (MRI)$1,240
- Dr. Chen consult$ 450
- Lost wages (3 wks)$2,700
- ReleasedDemand letter · Boston Logistics adjusterTo: claims@statefarm.com · 4 attachments
- ReleasedStatus update · Mr. RiveraTo: client@rivera.dn
- QueuedRecords cover · Dr. Chen officeTo: records@drchen-ortho.com
Every active case, every stage, at a glance.
Zoom out from one case to the whole docket. Paula keeps every matter in the right lane, with the last action it took and the next one it's queueing.
Every capability a paralegal team relies on — productized.
One inbox-native product, eight named capabilities, all the recurring case work — with judgment calls left to the attorney.
Records & bills request generator
Provider-specific templates prefilled from case context. Drafts go to attorney approval, never auto-send.
- Mass General EDSent
- Cambridge PTSent
- Boston ImagingSent
- Dr. Chen, OrthoDrafted
Records tracker dashboard
Requested · received · chasing · missing — across every active matter, always up to date.
Automated follow-up cadence
Email · fax · portal retries on schedule, escalations drafted when providers go silent.
- Day 0Records request sent
- Day 14Auto follow-up #1
- Day 21Fax + portal retry
- Day 30Escalation drafted
Medical chronology builder
Date-ordered treatment summary with citations linking every entry to the source record page.
- 05/03PT eval · Cambridge PTEx B · p.1
- 05/10Cervical MRI · Boston ImagingEx C · p.4
- 05/22PT (6 visits) · Cambridge PTEx B · p.7
Demand letter v1 — your template
Generated in your firm's voice with source-linked claims. The attorney inherits a starting point, not a blank page.
Mr. Rivera was rear-ended on April 28 [Ex E] and presented to the MGH ED with cervical and lumbar strain [Ex A].
[§ Damages roll up from specials table.]
Attorney-in-the-loop workflow
Every external send queues in an approval inbox. Nothing leaves the firm without attorney release.
Specials & damages summary
Treatments, providers, and charges organized and totaled — ready for the demand draft.
- MGH ED$3,420
- Cambridge PT$2,180
- Boston Imaging$1,240
- Dr. Chen$ 450
- Lost wages$2,700
Exportable demand package
Cover letter, chronology, exhibits index, and organized PDF appendices — one-click to insurer-ready.
Auditable from start to finish.
Paula grounds outputs in the underlying records and logs every action, so attorneys can verify the work — not just trust it.
Citations in chronologies
Every line in Paula's medical chronology links back to the underlying record page, so attorneys can verify facts in seconds — not minutes of page-flipping.
Source-linked drafts
Demand-letter sections and follow-up drafts cite the records and emails they pull from. No floating assertions — every claim is traceable.
Action log for every send
Full deterministic audit trail of every outgoing request, reminder, and received document. Who, when, what, and which case event triggered it.
Autonomy where it helps. Attorney control where it matters.
Paula can automate paralegal workflows, but the highest-risk boundaries are enforced by code. User permissions, recipient routing, external send approval, supervising attorney requirements, file storage, and audit logs are deterministic.
Paula is designed to replace repetitive paralegal labor, not attorney supervision. Every external communication is queued for attorney approval before it leaves the firm.
What Paula is not
- Not merely a document filing tool
- Not a generic chatbot
- Not an attorney replacement
- Not unsupervised legal judgment
Autonomous paralegal work
- Read case emails
- Update case status
- Track open items
- Draft follow-ups
- Prepare letters
- Summarize records and bills
- Draft demand-letter sections
- Answer internal case questions
Attorney-controlled actions
- External sends
- Legal judgment
- Claim validity decisions
- Settlement strategy
- Final demand letters
- Client-facing legal advice
- High-risk exceptions
- Approvals and releases
Built with attorney-client privilege in mind.
Confidentiality is a hard requirement for legal work, not a feature flag. Paula is designed around controls that give managing partners and IT leads confidence before pilot.
Talk to us about your security reviewEncryption in transit and at rest
All data is encrypted end-to-end across storage and network paths.
Role-based access controls
Per-user permissions scoped to firm, matter, and action type.
Full audit log of system activity
Every read, write, draft, and send is logged with attribution.
Configurable data retention
Retention windows match your firm's records-management policy.
Not used to train public models
Customer data is never used to train third-party foundation models.
Outlook-native deployment
Paula reads and writes within your existing Microsoft tenant where possible.
Built around the economics of injury case work.
For personal injury firms, paralegal capacity is the constraint on how many cases can move forward at once. Paula changes the unit economics of that work.
Small cases become economical.
Soft-tissue and lower-value cases that didn't justify paralegal hours now get the full treatment — records, chronology, and demand prep — at a fraction of the cost. The viable case bar moves down.
Paralegals move faster with less burnout.
Repetitive chasing, indexing, and formatting is handled automatically. The team focuses on judgment, client relationships, and the cases that need a human touch.
Cases stop stalling between tasks
Paula proactively pushes each case toward the next action, instead of waiting for someone to notice.
Records and bills arrive faster
Open items are tracked at the case level and chased on schedule, not when someone remembers.
Paralegals work on judgment, not chasing
Repetitive follow-up, summarization, and drafting moves off the human queue.
Attorneys see ready-to-release work
External communications arrive in an approval inbox, already drafted from real case context.
Illustrative impact areas
Illustrative — not benchmarked claimsTime-to-records reduced
Open items closed per week
Drafts prepared without staff time
Cases progressed per paralegal
"We believe AI paralegals can expand access to justice by making more injury cases economically viable."
Not a chatbot. A workflow engine.
What PI teams are saying.
The fact that every line in the chronology links back to the original record gives me real confidence before I sign off.
Paula cut our records chasing time dramatically — and the case files are cleaner than what we were producing manually.
We're finally able to work smaller soft-tissue cases profitably without burning out the team.
Frequently asked questions.
The questions managing partners, paralegals, and IT leads typically ask before pilot.
Is Paula a law firm? Does Paula give legal advice?
Does Paula communicate with insurers or providers automatically?
What does "attorney-in-the-loop" mean in Paula?
How does Paula avoid making things up?
What documents and inboxes does Paula work with?
Can Paula use our firm's demand templates?
How do you handle confidentiality and data retention?
Built by an operator focused on practical legal workflows.
Paula is in private beta, developed alongside personal injury firms with a focus on the recurring case work that actually consumes paralegal time — and on doing it responsibly inside attorney supervision.
"Paula isn't another chatbot bolted onto a case-management system. It's an inbox-native AI paralegal that takes the recurring work off the team — under attorney control — so firms can take on more cases without growing headcount."
Put Paula to work.
Be among the first PI firms to bring on an AI paralegal. We'll reach out within a few business days to schedule a pilot conversation.
- Private beta cohort
- Hands-on onboarding with the founder
- Pilot scoped to your firm's case mix